Comparison of different cesarean delivery techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Full Text (PDF)
Ainura Yuldasheva 1 * , Gulzhakhan Omarova 1 , Zhanara Begniyazova 1 , Shynar Saduakassova 1 , Elmira Makhmutova 1 , Aliya Meirmanova 1
More Detail
1 Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, KAZAKHSTAN* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis study was to compare various caesarean delivery methods.
Methods: A search for available articles published since January 2023 was accomplished in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane literature databases. The search method that encompassed all pertinent publications was developed using terms from the medical subject headings thesaurus and keywords from related literature. We also used the PICO method (where P is population, I is intervention, C is comparator/control, and O is outcome for our study) to establish research question. Whereas Cochrane handbook of “systematic reviews of interventions” was used for risk of bias assessment.
Results: The results showed a significant difference in patient gratification between the gentle/natural/skin-to-skin contact caesarean and the traditional/conventional/standard caesarean. In assessing the satisfaction with delivery mode, the mean variance for these studies similarly revealed a significant difference between the natural caesarean and the conventional one. A skin-to-skin contact caesarean delivery takes less time to start nursing than a conventional delivery, according to the results of the study on the time of breastfeeding initiation after a natural caesarean. There was a low-risk bias among the selected studies.
Conclusions: As a result of greater satisfaction with delivering experience the natural caesarean delivery was most preferred method. The enhanced skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding suggested that natural caesarean is beneficial over the conventional method.

Keywords

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Review Article

ELECTRON J GEN MED, Volume 20, Issue 6, December 2023, Article No: em539

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/13590

Publication date: 01 Nov 2023

Online publication date: 20 Aug 2023

Article Views: 1856

Article Downloads: 1226

Open Access References How to cite this article