Electronic Journal of General Medicine

• Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69-90.
• Parkin DM, Almonte M, Bruni L, et al. Burden and trends of type-specific human papillomavirus infections and related diseases in the latin america and Caribbean region. Vaccine. 2008;26:L1-L15.
• Mathew A, George PS. Trends in incidence and mortality rates of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of cervixVworldwide. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10: 645-50.
• Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Pratice. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
• Gilson M, Desai A, Cardoza-Favarato G, Vroman P, Thornton JA. Does gel affect cytology or comfort in the screening papanicolaou smear? J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(4):340-4.
• Mody DR, Nayar R, Thrall M. 2001 Bethesda System classification of glandular lesions on cervical cytology. Monogr Clin Cytol. 2011;20:5-14.
• Canda MT, Demir N, Sezer O, Doganay L, Ortac R. Clinical results of the liquid-based cervical cytology tool, Liqui-PREP, in comparison with conventional smears for detection of squamous cell abnormalities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:399-402.
• Chen C, Yang Z, Li Z, Li L. Accuracy of several cervical screening strategies for early detection of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22:908-21.
• Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, Mcintoch K, Inhorn SL. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, Thin- Layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:278-284.
• Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC, Hildesheim A, Lorincz AT, Greenberg MD, Morales J, Sciffman M. Utility of liquid based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening, results of a population based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinom. Cancer. 1999;87:48-55.
• Beerman H, van Dorst EB, Kuenen-Boumeester V, Hogendoorn PC. Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Mar;112(3):572-576.
• Lozano R. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology. Gynecologic Oncology. 2007;104,134-138.
• Luthra UK, Chisti M, Deyt P, Jolly SV, Abdulla M, Das DK, Sugathan TN, Ajrawi MT, George SS, George J, Aziz AA, Al-Juwaiser A, Karim FA, Mallik MK, Sheikh ZA, Khan S. Performance of monolayered cervical smears in gynecology outpatient setting in Kuwait. Acta Cytol. 2002;46:303-310.
• Park J, Jung EH, Kim C, Choi YH. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35(8):488-492.
• Davey E, d'Assuncao J, Irwig L, Macaskill P, Chan SF, Richards A, Farnsworth A. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7609):31.
• Cheung ANY, Szeto E, Leung BSY, Khoo U, Ng AWY. Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Cervical Smears. A Comparison Study in an Asian Screening Population Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2003;99:331-335.
• Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz MG, Nikolau SM, Stavale JN, Focchi J, Castelo A, Lorincz A, Rodrigues G. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional pap smears. Diag Cytopathol. 2004;30:220-226.
• Neville AM, Quinn MA. An alternative cost effectiveness analysis of ThinPrep in the Australian setting. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45:289-294.
• de Bekker-Grob EW, de Kok IM, Bulten J, van Rosmalen J, Vedder JE, Arbyn M, Klinkhamer PJ, Siebers AG, van Ballegooijen M. Liquid-based cervical cytology using ThinPrep technology: weighing the pros and cons in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23:1323-1331.

Vancouver

Alkan-Kuşabbi İ, Aydoğmuş H, Işık H, Seven A, Yüksel B, Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen G, et al. Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?. EUR J GEN MED. 2017;14(1):5-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81871

APA

Alkan-Kuşabbi, İ., Aydoğmuş, H., Işık, H., Seven, A., Yüksel, B., Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen, G., Karçaaltıncaba, D., Ergün, Y., Çaydere, M., & Batıoğlu, S. (2017). Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?. European Journal of General Medicine, 14(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81871

AMA

Alkan-Kuşabbi İ, Aydoğmuş H, Işık H, et al. Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?. EUR J GEN MED. 2017;14(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81871

Chicago

Alkan-Kuşabbi, İlknur, Hüseyin Aydoğmuş, Hatice Işık, Ali Seven, Beril Yüksel, Gülenay Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen, Deniz Karçaaltıncaba, Yusuf Ergün, Muzaffer Çaydere, and Sertaç Batıoğlu. "Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?". European Journal of General Medicine 2017 14 no. 1 (2017): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81871

Harvard

Alkan-Kuşabbi, İ., Aydoğmuş, H., Işık, H., Seven, A., Yüksel, B., Gençosmanoğlu-Türkmen, G., . . . Batıoğlu, S. (2017). Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?. European Journal of General Medicine, 14(1), pp. 5-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81871

MLA

Alkan-Kuşabbi, İlknur et al. "Is liquid-based cervical cytology test more effective than conventional pap smear?". European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, 2017, pp. 5-8. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/81871